China-US Trade Dispute/Experts

Claiming US helps rebuild China with huge trade deficit absurd: experts

  • English
  • Français
  • العربية
  • Pусский
  • Español
  • 日本語
  • Deutsch

Shotlist


Beijing, China - May 21, 2019 (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
1. Various of building, sign of School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
2. SOUNDBITE (Chinese) Ma Hong, associate professor of economics, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University:
"The proportion of U.S. multinational companies' investment in the foreign direct investment into China is not the largest. We have attracted a large amount of investment from Japan, South Korea, and the region of Taiwan. These cross-regional investment has also greatly promoted China's economic development."

FILE: Washington D.C., USA - Date Unknown (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
3. Various of White House

Beijing, China - May 21, 2019 (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
4. SOUNDBITE (Chinese) Wang Peng, associate research fellow, Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China:
"The United States has started trade wars not once or twice, and China is not the first victim. The European Union, including Germany, France and UK, all the countries have used funds from the Marshall Plan (a U.S. initiative to aid Western Europe) are labeled as such, not to mention Japan or South Korea."

FILE: New York, USA - Date Unknown (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
5. Various of pedestrians

Beijing, China - May 21, 2019 (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
6. SOUNDBITE (Chinese) Ma Hong, associate professor of economics, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University:
"Rather than thinking that Americans have helped China, it's better to say that the U.S. entrepreneurs and politicians have been keenly aware of the potential of China's huge market, and the production capacity that China's low labor costs, and therefore, they chose to come to invest in China. In this process, a large part of the huge profits generated in the bilateral trade has entered the pockets of the multinational corporations. Besides, in the trade exchanges between China and the United States, China has brought huge benefits to the American consumers by exporting cheap and fine products. So I don't think the bilateral trade is a one-way offer from the United States to China."

FILE: Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, east China - Date Unknown (CGTN - No access Chinese mainland)
7. Various of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port scenes

Storyline


Some Chinese experts on Tuesday refuted the claim that massive U.S.trade deficit with China amounts to great wealth given by Washington to China and the United States rebuilt China by its huge investment.

They pointed out such claims are absurd, and they are nothing but lame excuses used by the United States to justify its trade war against China.

Ma Hong, an associate professor of economics in the School of Economics and Management with the Tsinghua University said that the claim is absurd.

"The proportion of U.S. multinational companies' investment in the foreign direct investment into China is not the largest. We have attracted a large amount of investment from Japan, South Korea, and the region of Taiwan. These cross-regional investment has also greatly promoted China's economic development," said Ma.

In fact, since 1987 when China started keeping statistics on foreign investment, the country has accumulatively utilized foreign capital of more than 2 trillion U.S. dollars. Investment from the United States was 81.36 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 4.06 percent.

Wang Peng, associate research fellow with the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at the Renmin University of China said that it is the consistent practice of the United States to start a trade war and flaunt with such claims in its competitions with other economies in the world.

"The United States has started trade wars not once or twice, and China is not the first victim. The European Union, including Germany, France and UK, all the countries have used funds from the Marshall Plan (a U.S. initiative to aid Western Europe) are labeled as such, not to mention Japan or South Korea," said Wang.

Experts said that the U.S. trade deficit with China is derived from the comparative advantages and international division of labor of the two countries.

"Rather than thinking that Americans have helped China, it's better to say that the U.S. entrepreneurs and politicians have been keenly aware of the potential of China's huge market, and the production capacity that China's low labor costs, and therefore, they chose to come to invest in China. In this process, a large part of the huge profits generated in the bilateral trade has entered the pockets of the multinational corporations. Besides, in the trade exchanges between China and the United States, China has brought huge benefits to the American consumers by exporting cheap and fine products. So I don't think the bilateral trade is a one-way offer from the United States to China," said Ma.

The experts said that China's reconstruction relies on its own hard work and continuous economic development. The large market of 1.4 billion people, a complete industrial chain and the advantage of human resources and talent have provided a strong momentum for China's economic development.

DOWNLOAD
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : May 21, 2019/File
  • Location : Beijing,China
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : Chinese/Nats/Part Mute
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV),China Global Television Network (CGTN)
  • Restrictions : No access Chinese mainland
  • Published : 2019-05-22 09:29
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : 21 mai 2019/Archives
  • Location : Beijing,Chine
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : Chinois/Nats/Partiellement muet
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV),China Global Television Network (CGTN)
  • Restrictions : Pas d’accès dans la partie continentale de Chine
  • Published : 2019-05-22 09:29
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : 21 مايو 2019/أرشيف
  • Location : بكين,الصين
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : الصينية/الصوت الطبيعي/صامت جزئيا
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV),China Global Television Network (CGTN)
  • Restrictions : No access Chinese mainland
  • Published : 2019-05-22 18:55
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : 21 мая 2019/Архив
  • Location : Пекин,Китай
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : Китайский/Естественный звук/Частично немое
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV)
  • Restrictions : Недоступно материковой части Китая
  • Published : 2019-05-22 19:51
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : 21 may. 2019/Archivo
  • Location : Beijing,China
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : Chino/Nats/Parte Muda
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV)
  • Restrictions : No acceso a la parte continental de China
  • Published : 2019-05-22 09:29
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : 2019年5月21日/資料
  • Location : 北京,中国
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : 中国語/自然音声/一部音声なし
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV),China Global Television Network (CGTN)
  • Restrictions : 中国大陸での使用は不可
  • Published : 2019-05-23 11:59
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1
  • ID : 8111318
  • Dateline : 21. Mai 2019/Archiv
  • Location : Beijing,China
  • Category : economy, business and finance
  • Duration : 1'49
  • Audio Language : Chinesisch/Originalton/Teilweise ohne Ton
  • Source : China Central Television (CCTV),China Global Television Network (CGTN)
  • Restrictions : Für das chinesische Festland nicht verfügbar
  • Published : 2019-05-22 09:29
  • Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00
  • Version : 1

China-US Trade Dispute/Experts

Claiming US helps rebuild China with huge trade deficit absurd: experts

Dateline : May 21, 2019/File

Location : Beijing,China

Duration : 1'49

  • English
  • Français
  • العربية
  • Pусский
  • Español
  • 日本語
  • Deutsch


Beijing, China - May 21, 2019 (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
1. Various of building, sign of School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
2. SOUNDBITE (Chinese) Ma Hong, associate professor of economics, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University:
"The proportion of U.S. multinational companies' investment in the foreign direct investment into China is not the largest. We have attracted a large amount of investment from Japan, South Korea, and the region of Taiwan. These cross-regional investment has also greatly promoted China's economic development."

FILE: Washington D.C., USA - Date Unknown (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
3. Various of White House

Beijing, China - May 21, 2019 (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
4. SOUNDBITE (Chinese) Wang Peng, associate research fellow, Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China:
"The United States has started trade wars not once or twice, and China is not the first victim. The European Union, including Germany, France and UK, all the countries have used funds from the Marshall Plan (a U.S. initiative to aid Western Europe) are labeled as such, not to mention Japan or South Korea."

FILE: New York, USA - Date Unknown (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
5. Various of pedestrians

Beijing, China - May 21, 2019 (CCTV - No access Chinese mainland)
6. SOUNDBITE (Chinese) Ma Hong, associate professor of economics, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University:
"Rather than thinking that Americans have helped China, it's better to say that the U.S. entrepreneurs and politicians have been keenly aware of the potential of China's huge market, and the production capacity that China's low labor costs, and therefore, they chose to come to invest in China. In this process, a large part of the huge profits generated in the bilateral trade has entered the pockets of the multinational corporations. Besides, in the trade exchanges between China and the United States, China has brought huge benefits to the American consumers by exporting cheap and fine products. So I don't think the bilateral trade is a one-way offer from the United States to China."

FILE: Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, east China - Date Unknown (CGTN - No access Chinese mainland)
7. Various of Ningbo-Zhoushan Port scenes


Some Chinese experts on Tuesday refuted the claim that massive U.S.trade deficit with China amounts to great wealth given by Washington to China and the United States rebuilt China by its huge investment.

They pointed out such claims are absurd, and they are nothing but lame excuses used by the United States to justify its trade war against China.

Ma Hong, an associate professor of economics in the School of Economics and Management with the Tsinghua University said that the claim is absurd.

"The proportion of U.S. multinational companies' investment in the foreign direct investment into China is not the largest. We have attracted a large amount of investment from Japan, South Korea, and the region of Taiwan. These cross-regional investment has also greatly promoted China's economic development," said Ma.

In fact, since 1987 when China started keeping statistics on foreign investment, the country has accumulatively utilized foreign capital of more than 2 trillion U.S. dollars. Investment from the United States was 81.36 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 4.06 percent.

Wang Peng, associate research fellow with the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at the Renmin University of China said that it is the consistent practice of the United States to start a trade war and flaunt with such claims in its competitions with other economies in the world.

"The United States has started trade wars not once or twice, and China is not the first victim. The European Union, including Germany, France and UK, all the countries have used funds from the Marshall Plan (a U.S. initiative to aid Western Europe) are labeled as such, not to mention Japan or South Korea," said Wang.

Experts said that the U.S. trade deficit with China is derived from the comparative advantages and international division of labor of the two countries.

"Rather than thinking that Americans have helped China, it's better to say that the U.S. entrepreneurs and politicians have been keenly aware of the potential of China's huge market, and the production capacity that China's low labor costs, and therefore, they chose to come to invest in China. In this process, a large part of the huge profits generated in the bilateral trade has entered the pockets of the multinational corporations. Besides, in the trade exchanges between China and the United States, China has brought huge benefits to the American consumers by exporting cheap and fine products. So I don't think the bilateral trade is a one-way offer from the United States to China," said Ma.

The experts said that China's reconstruction relies on its own hard work and continuous economic development. The large market of 1.4 billion people, a complete industrial chain and the advantage of human resources and talent have provided a strong momentum for China's economic development.

ID : 8111318

Published : 2019-05-22 09:29

Last Modified : 2019-05-23 12:16:00

Source : China Central Television (CCTV),China Global Television Network (CGTN)

Restrictions : No access Chinese mainland

More



Login
Username
Password
code
Sign In
OK